Legal Opinion
United States v. William E. "Jack" Street
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 24, 1995No. 94-3972PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
The appellant Street challenges his jury conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 111(a) (1988) for forcibly assaulting, resisting, opposing, impeding, intimidating or interfering with park rangers while they were engaged in or on account of the performance of their official duties. He contends that the indictment was duplicitous and multiplicitous, that the district court ** improperly admitted certain evidence, and that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. He also contends that the district court erred in applying the United States Sentencing…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Piero Heliczer, Jack William Martin, Iii, and Jack v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- United States v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Glennis L. Bolden, United States of America v. Clifford E. BoldenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Keith Bernard Crenshaw, United States of America v. Kamil Hakeem Johnson, United States of America v. Timothy Kevin McGruderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Antwon A. Warfield, United States of America v. Brian M. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Robert M. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.