Legal Opinion

United States v. Keith Bernard Crenshaw, United States of America v. Kamil Hakeem Johnson, United States of America v. Timothy Kevin McGruder

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 2, 2004No. 02-4084, 02-4085, 03-1067PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

Keith Crenshaw, Timothy McGruder, and Kamil Johnson were convicted of murder in aid of racketeering and sentenced to imprisonment for life without release. They appeal their convictions, arguing that the evidence against them, which consisted mostly of the testimony of their gang leader, his relatives, and the defendants’ putative get-away driver, was insufficient to support their convictions. They also contend that the statute under which they were convicted, 18 U.S.C. § 1959 (2000), is unconstitutional because it overreaches Congress’s power under the Commerce…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Donald R. Ferguson v. United States v. Richard Musal, Third Party Nicholas P. Miller, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Spotted ElkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Gabriel Parra LopezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. State v. SawyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API