Legal Opinion

Roach v. Junction Oil & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 1, 1919No. 8870PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Error from District Court, Kay County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by Maggie Roach against the Junction Oil & Gas Company and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

HARDY, O. J.

Plaintiff in error commenced this action in the district court of Kay county on the 7th day of March, 1916, to have declared null and yoid and of no effect an oil and gas mining lease executed by her and her husband on January 9, 1911, and assigned by the original lessee to the Junction Oil & Gas Company on December 7, 1914, .and to restrain defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s possession of the land and praying that possession thereof be restored to plaintiff. Judgment was for defendant, and plaintiff prosecutes error.

Plaintiff claims the lease expied by its own…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Steelsmith v. GartlanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Huggins v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1900
  3. Eastern Oil Co. v. CoulehanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Brennan v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Paraffine Oil Co. v. CruceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. HALL v. GALMORSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  2. Parks v. Sinai Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land Office v. Carter Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Samuel G. Whitaker and Elizabeth Whitaker v. Texaco Inc. (Formerly Named the Texas Company), a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  5. Simons v. McDanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API