Legal Opinion

Everts v. Holtmann

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 3, 1983No. A8004-01985; A25429PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVanhoomissen, J.

Plaintiffs, trustees of two pension and profit sharing trusts, brought this action, alleging that defendants had unlawfully offered and sold securities to the trusts in violation of ORS 59.115(l)(b) and ORS 59.115(3). 1 The trial court gave a summary judgment in favor of defendant McLeod, and plaintiffs appeal. 2 The issue is whether McLeod sustained his burden of showing that there was no genuine issue of material fact as to him and that he was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Viewing the record in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, we conclude that issues of fact were raised by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. The Johns Hopkins University v. William E. HuttonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  3. Neil Rogen v. Ilikon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  4. Johns Hopkins University v. HuttonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
  5. Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hines v. Data Line Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Gohler v. WoodUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Oregon Public Employees' Retirement Board v. Simat, Helliesen & EichnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Loewen v. GalliganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API