Legal Opinion

Santilli v. State Farm Life Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1977No. CC 75-252, SC 24510PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant in an action to recover on a life insurance policy issued by the defendant insurance company on plaintiff’s husband. The facts are not in dispute and were presented to the trial court by stipulation.

In November, 1972, plaintiff’s husband, Edward Santilli, made application to State Farm Life Insurance Company to purchase a mortgage life insurance policy. Mr. Santilli was quoted a "standard” premium of $120.40 per year. However, as a result of disclosures on the application form, the defendant insurance company required him…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PetersonNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Ledingham v. Blue Cross Plan for Hospital Care of Hospital Service Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Noble v. National American Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API