In re Hyson
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Rich, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1-12 in appellant’s applica*783tion serial Ho. 614,817, filed February 9, 1967, for “Liquid Uracil Concentrates.” We affirm.
The Subject Matter Claimed
Appellant claims liquid, water-soluble concentrates composed of tbe lithium salts of certain 3,5,6-substituted uracils dissolved in a mixture of water and specified lower alcohols. The specification teaches that these concentrates are useful as herbicides applicable in diluted form by direct-spray techniques. Claims 1 and 3 are…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Application of James R. Tiffin and Earl ErdmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of John Charles CavanaghCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- In re LindnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- In re GreenfieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- In re CarletonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- In re Tsoung-Yuan YanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972