Legal Opinion

In re Hyson

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 27, 1972No. 8617PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1-12 in appellant’s applica*783tion serial Ho. 614,817, filed February 9, 1967, for “Liquid Uracil Concentrates.” We affirm.

The Subject Matter Claimed

Appellant claims liquid, water-soluble concentrates composed of tbe lithium salts of certain 3,5,6-substituted uracils dissolved in a mixture of water and specified lower alcohols. The specification teaches that these concentrates are useful as herbicides applicable in diluted form by direct-spray techniques. Claims 1 and 3 are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Application of James R. Tiffin and Earl ErdmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. Application of John Charles CavanaghCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  2. In re LindnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. In re GreenfieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  4. In re CarletonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  5. In re Tsoung-Yuan YanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API