Legal Opinion
In re Lindner
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 6, 1972No. 8684PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Almond, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 15, 17, and 19 in appellant’s application entitled “Dispersant Compositions Comprising (A) Phosphoric Esters of Ethoxylated Long Chain Compounds and (B) Surfactant Polybasic Compounds Containing at Least One Sulfonic or Sulfuric Acid Radical.”1 No claims have been allowed.
The invention relates to dispersant compositions which are particularly useful in emulsifying water-insoluble organic solvent solutions of biocidal toxicant (i.e., insecticide,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Application of James R. Tiffin and Earl ErdmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of James H. Saunders and Paul G. GemeinhardtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- In re HysonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Application of John Charles CavanaghCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- In re D'AnciccoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Francis J.A.M.C. De Blauwe and Frank K.A. SelleslagsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Pravin L. Soni, Ceinwen Rowlands, Larry Edwards and Mark WartenbergCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Cfmt, Inc. And Cfm Technologies, Inc. v. Yieldup International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- In Re Michael Geisler, Rudolf Kotter-Faulhaber, Susanne Wuerz and Michael JungCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In re PayneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.