Application of John Charles Cavanagh
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal 1 is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals insofar as it affirmed the rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 21, and 22 in appellant’s reissue application serial No. 371,862, filed April 20, 1964, for a “Process for the Production of Protein Enriched Material From Protein-Containing Materials Having a Relatively High Water Content.” We affirm.
THE INVENTION
The claimed process is for producing a protein-enriched product from water- and protein-containing materials of animal origin, such as waste from abattoirs, fish-processing plants, and whaling stations.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re LindnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- In re HysonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Application of Unokichi TakaiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Halozyme, Inc. v. IancuDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018