Zavisin v. City of Loveland
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
The question before this court is the interrelationship between R.C. 124.44,1 which provides the procedure for pro*160motion of police patrolmen, and R.C. 124.37,2 which sets forth the procedure for removals, reappointments and demotions in police and fire departments. Specifically the issue is whether upon a vacancy in a position above the rank of patrolman, must the vacancy be filled pursuant to R.C. 124.44 or may the vacant position be abolished within the sixty-day period?
When a position in a police department has been both established and occupied by appointment, a vacancy in that position…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Bardo v. City of LyndhurstOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Hungler v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- McCarter v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Vogeler v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Bednar v. City of North CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Bednar v. N. CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Smith v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Mylott v. McKelveyOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Waters v. International Harvester Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.