Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1993No. C-910792PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

On May 5, 1987, plaintiffs-appellants, nine police officers holding ranks below that of sergeant in the Cincinnati Police Division, 1 filed a complaint for declaratory judgment in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas alleging that defendants-appellees had violated certain provisions of the consent decree entered August 13, 1981, in United States of America v. City of Cincinnati, Civil No. C-l-80-369, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. Appellants claimed that as a result of appellees’ violations of the consent decree, specifically, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hungler v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. United States v. Wallace (Vernard), A/K/A Johnson (Anthony)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Pell v. City of WestlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Weston v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Zagorski v. South Euclid-Lyndhurst City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McAlpin v. ShireyOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Deem v. Fairview ParkOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API