Legal Opinion

City of Milwaukee v. Drew

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1936PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The appeal is-taken, (1) by the personal representative of the city treasurer, whose official acts are in question; (2) by the defendant Rosenberg, whose transactions with Drew are claimed to have resulted in a breach of duty by Drew; and (3) by the sureties who, during the several terms of Drew as city treasurer, were obligated upon his official-bonds.

Since the parties to this appeal have divergent interests, and since the appeal presents quite complicated questions, some of which affect all of the appellants and some of which do not, it will be convenient first to consider whether the first…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. State v. McFetridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Cawker v. DreutzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Jones v. MonsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Boston v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. City of Jersey City v. HagueSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  3. Singer v. SingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Caveney v. CaveneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Theodore Rosenak v. Lou PollerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API