Legal Opinion

City of Jersey City v. Hague

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 13, 1955PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court ivas delivered by

Vanderbilt, C. J.

Defendant Prank Hague moved, without supporting affidavit, to dismiss the complaint “for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted” and the trial court granted the motion. The plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court and we certified the case on our own motion while it was pending there.

I. Tiie Pacts oe the Complaint

Ho principle of pleading is better established, not only under our rules of court but under the practice that preceded it, Kelly v. Hoffman, 137 N. J. L. 695 (E. & A. 1948), 41 Am.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. United States v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Mammoth Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. City of Boston v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Di Cristofaro v. Laurel Grove Memorial ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Township of Lyndhurst v. Priceline.Com Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. Coastal Group v. Dryvit SystemsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  4. Leslie Blau Co. v. AlfieriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. City of Chicago Ex Rel. Cohen v. KeaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API