Regents of the University of Michigan v. Rose
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Washtenaw. Motion for leave to proceed without printing the record. Motion for leave to be heard before printing the record.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.
A motion has been made by the appellants to dispense with the printing of the record, or a part thereof, in this case.
From statements of counsel, and a showing made, it appears that boohs and other similar exhibits constitute a considerable part of the record. Such exhibits we never require to be printed. How much of the other evidence should be, can only be determined on examination, or perhaps by counsel, subject to approval by this court.
It appears, from the statement' of Mr. Gutcheon, that the Begents have at this time no authorized counsel to represent them, and the case is of such…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wiggins v. BurkhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Saunders v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- President, Directors & Co. of Rensselaer Glass Factory v. ReidCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
- Reid v. President & Directors of the Rensselaer Glass FactoryNew York Supreme Court · 1824
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sebastian v. CheneyTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Bros., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- City of Grand Rapids, Mich. v. McCurdyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Mitchell v. Reolds Farms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Van Meter v. BassSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.