Legal Opinion

Moore v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 17, 1876No. 81PublishedCited by 61 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Claims. This was a suit to recover the sum of $5,780 on account of cotton seized by the United States. The court below found that the petitioner, a British subject, OAvned and was possessed of 26-| bales of cotton stored in a ware- • house in St. Joseph’s, in the State of Louisiana.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Court of Claims. This was a suit to recover the sum of $5,780 on account of cotton seized by the United States. The court below found that the petitioner, a British subject, OAvned and was possessed of 26-| bales of cotton stored in a ware- • house in St. Joseph’s, in the State of Louisiana. That on the twelfth day of December, 1863, it was seized by the United States, by the boats of their marine brigade under the command of Colonel Ellet, and taken from the possession of the petitioner and sold by the United States, and the net proceeds thereof, amounting to the sum of…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bradley

According to the facts found in this case, we -think no error was committed by the court below. The only question of importance is, whether the signature to the document bearing date Dec. 17, 1863, and purporting to be executed by the claimant, was properly proved. The court compared it with his signature to another paper in ■ evidence for other purposes in the cause, respecting which there seems to have been no question; and from that comparison adjudged and found that the signature was his. Had the court a right to do this ? The Court of Claims, like a court of equity or admiralty, or an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Doe ex dem. Henderson v. HackneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1854

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API