Legal Opinion

Sebastian v. Cheney

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1894No. 110PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Fifth District, in an appeal frdm' Grayson County.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

Cheney sued Sebastian in the District Court of Grayson County to recover damages for malicious prosecutions of plaintiff, alleged to have been caused and maintained by defendant with malice and without probable cause.

Defendant answered, alleging, that the plaintiff had rented land from him under a contract that he, plaintiff, would cultivate and gather the crop upon the land and deliver to defendant one-fourth of the cotton raised thereon; that plaintiff had sold about $96 worth of the cotton, had appropriated the defendant’s interest (one-fourth part) to his own use,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. ArrottTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Schippel v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. Dennis v. . RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. William M. Ross & Co. v. InnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Huntington v. GaultMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Kroger Texas Ltd. Partnership v. SuberuTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Richey v. Brookshire Grocery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. v. LieckTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Akin v. DahlTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Thomas v. CisnerosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API