Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 30, 1996No. Nos. 94-362C, 94-544C, 94-545CPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

The United States Department of Agriculture, acting through the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”), regularly contracts with private companies for the removal of stumpage in the woodlands under its control. On sales of merchantable timber removed, the Forest Service issues Bills for Collection on a regular basis to the purchasers. Those bills are calculated using the current contract rates for merchantable timber, and the volume of timber removed. Three such contracts are currently before the court: the Butte West Salvage I Timber Sale, No. 091433 (the “Butte…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cienega Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  2. District of Columbia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. State v. Ernst & Young, LLPNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  4. Abatement Contracting Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Ahrens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API