Legal Opinion
Abatement Contracting Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 26, 2003No. 97-770 CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ME ROW, Senior Judge.
On June 11, 1993, the United States Naval Academy solicited bids for a “Requirements Contract for Asbestos Removal and Insulation Installation, U.S. Naval Academy and U.S. Naval Station, Annapolis, Maryland” with an estimated cost of between $500,000.00 and $1,000,000.00. PLApp. 001, 003-009. By Amendment/Modification No. 0001 dated June 14,1993, the Solicitation was amended from a requirements to an indefinite quantity contract. PLApp. 010-014. The indefinite quantity contract (“Contract”) made it clear that it was not a fixed-price contract, that there were no…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Am-Pro Protective Agency, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Community Heating & Plumbing Company, Inc. v. Admiral Frank B. Kelso, Ii, Acting Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Monon Corporation and Rosby Corporation, Plaintiffs-Cross v. Stoughton Trailers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- A & D Fire Protection, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Admiral Financial Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Unfoldment, Inc. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Cygnus Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- J.L. Simmons Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.