Legal Opinion
Mayfield v. United States
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 26, 2007No. Civil 04-1427-AAPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AIKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint requests declaratory relief that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA”), as amended by the Patriot Act, is unconstitutional.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs filed this case on October 4, 2004, alleging various civil rights violations. Specifically, plaintiffs alleged a Bivens 1 claim for unlawful arrest and imprisonment and unlawful searches and seizures against four individual defendants. See Complaint, Claims 1-10, ¶¶ 1-74.
Plaintiffs also brought a claim under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, alleging the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mayfield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Abu-JihaadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. DukaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- In Re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- United States v. MubayyidDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.