Legal Opinion
Mayfield v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 24, 2010No. 0735865oPublishedCited by 341 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
ORDER
The government’s Motion to Correct Factual Misstatements in the Panel Opinion is GRANTED. The opinion filed December 10, 2009 and reported at 588 F.3d 1252, is vacated, and a new opinion is filed concurrently with this Order.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. No further petitions for rehearing shall be filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
OPINION
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we must decide whether…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by341 opinions
- Manuel De Jesus Ortega Melendr v. Joseph M. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Navajo Nation v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Mark Munns v. John F. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Abu-JihaadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Palmdale Hills Property, LLC v. Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
336 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.