Legal Opinion
Dorsey v. United States Secretary of Agriculture
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 11, 2008No. Court 06-00449Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge:
On remand of Harley and Myra Dorsey’s application for trade adjustment assistance (“TAA”) cash benefits to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“Agriculture”), Foreign Agricultural Service (“FAS”), for reconsideration of whether their TAA net farm income declined (see Dorsey v. U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, Slip Op. 08-14 (Jan. 25, 2008), recons, denied, Slip Op. 08-32 (Mar. 19, 2008), familiarity with which is presumed), FAS has again reached a negative determination.
FAS first found the operation of the “wind machine” necessary for and directly…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- American Automobile Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.