Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. United States Secretary of Agriculture

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 25, 2008No. Court 06-00449Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge;

Concorde Farms, a small grape vineyard in Washington State owned and operated by Harley and Myra Dorsey, challenges the determination of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service (“USDA”), denying their application for monetary assistance under the Trade Adjustment Assistance Program for Farmers (“TAA”) for Washington concord grapes for marketing year 2004, as reconsidered pursuant to voluntary remand after this action was filed. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 2395(c). Concorde Farms moves for judgment pursuant to USCIT…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. Nova Scotia Food Products Corp., David Sklar and Emanuel Sklar, and National Fisheries Institute, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Ron Steen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. Former Employees of Shaw Pipe, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  5. Viet Do v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API