Legal Opinion

Springs Creative Prods. Grp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 16, 2013No. 10-00067Published

1Opinion of the Court

Slip Op. UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE SPRINGS CREATIVE PRODUCTS GROUP, Plaintiff, Richard W. Goldberg, Senior Judge v. Court No. 10-00067 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER [Judgment for Plaintiff.] Dated: August 16, 2013 Robert J. Leo and Ralph H. Sheppard, Meeks, Sheppard, Leo & Pillsbury LLP of New York, NY, argued for plaintiff. Amy M. Rubin, International Trade Field Office, U.S. Department of Justice, of New York, NY, argued for defendant. Goldberg, Senior Judge: Plaintiff Springs Creative Products Group (“SCPG”) challenges the United States Bureau of Customs and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API