Legal Opinion

Follese v. Eastern Airlines

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 20, 1978No. 47532 and 47552PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGOSHESKE, Justice.

The principal question raised on this certiorari review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals denying subject matter jurisdiction of an employee’s claim petition is whether Minnesota has a sufficient governmental interest in the employment relationship of the employer and employee and her out-of-state work-related injuries prior to 1967 to justify application of our workers’ compensation statutes in adjudicating the merits of her claims for medical and disability compensation benefits. We hold on the facts peculiar to this case that there exists a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Wilkerson v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stolpa v. Swanson Heavy Moving Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Pierce v. Robert D. Pierce, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Hutchins v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Vaughn v. Nelson Bros. ConstructionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Follese v. Eastern AirlinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API