Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Robert D. Pierce, Ltd.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 8, 1985No. C8-83-1668PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

If an employee has settled a claim brought against a former employer in another state for temporary total disability, retraining, and medical expenses, and thereafter obtains an award in Minnesota against his subsequent employer for temporary total disability and medical expenses arising out of the same disabling condition, is the later employer-insurer entitled to credit the amount of the settlement against the award? A divided Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals panel affirmed the compensation judge’s decision denying the credit. We reverse.

The underlying facts are not in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cook v. Minneapolis Bridge Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Houle v. Stearns-Rogers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Stolpa v. Swanson Heavy Moving Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Follese v. Eastern AirlinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Buganski v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Ansello v. Wisconsin Central, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Bruton v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API