Stolpa v. Swanson Heavy Moving Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
Michael Stolpa, a Wisconsin resident, seeks review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals determining that it does not have jurisdiction over a proceeding commenced by employee to recover compensation for disability allegedly resulting from work-connected injuries he sustained in Minnesota. Having concluded that the majority of the Court of Appeals misconstrued the applicable statute, Minn. Stat. § 176.041, subd. 4 (1980), we reverse and remand for entry of a compensation award in conformity with the other findings of fact initially made by the compensation…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kahn v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Follese v. Eastern AirlinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
3Cited by11 opinions
- Springer v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Kohler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Pierce v. Robert D. Pierce, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Martin v. Morrison Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Pauli v. Pneumatic Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.