Legal Opinion
Comptone Co. v. Opti-Ray, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 13, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 18616PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ROSLING, District Judge.
Judgment in favor of the defendant Opti-Ray, Inc. (Opti-Ray) is decreed, declaring claims 3 and 4 of Patent No. 2,816,666 and claims 3 to 9 inclusive of Reissue Patent No. 24,571, issued to Manuel R. Nadel, assignor of plaintiff, Comptone Co., Ltd. (Comptone), invalid for want of invention; and dismissing complaint insofar as it charges infringement of said claims. In respect of claims 1 and 2 of said Patents, as to which plaintiff, upon trial withdrew its charge of infringement and which were, accordingly, not the subject of proof, complaint is dismissed without…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Oelbaum v. Lovable CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962