Legal Opinion

Oelbaum v. Lovable Company

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 7, 1962PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVET, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff-patentee Freda Oelbaum for in fringement of United States Patent No. 2.817.089 issued to her on December 24, 1957 (hereinafter “Oelbaum patent”). The defendant is The Lovable Company (hereinafter “Lovable”), a manufacturer of brassieres and other ladies’ undergarments. Defendant denies infringement and validity of the Oelbaum patent and has counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment to this effect. By stipulation of counsel, only claim 4 of the Oelbaum patent is in issue.

After hearing the testimony of the parties, examining the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bendix Corp. v. Balax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  2. Ritter v. Rohm & Haas CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  3. Kurt H. Volk, Inc. v. Foundation for Christian LivingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. Teleflex Incorporated v. American Chain & Cable Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  5. Laminex, Inc. v. FritzDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API