United States v. Ronald Bruce Dixon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Dixon was convicted after a jury trial of aiding and abetting the possession of 454 grams of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and of conspiracy, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. On appeal, he contends (1) that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction; (2) that a hearsay statement was improperly admitted; and (3) that the prosecutor made improper and prejudicial remarks in his closing argument. We affirm.
I
The government called two witnesses, Gregory Miller, an undercover police agent, and Edward Becker, the police…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Julio C. Valle-ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Willie Dee Hood, United States of America v. Ella HoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. CalawayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. AmmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Robert HADDAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Frank G. PrantilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.