Legal Opinion
United States v. Ammar
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 30, 1983No. Nos. 81-1745, 81-1746, 81-1865 and 81-2064PublishedCited by 221 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
These are consolidated appeals from judgments of conviction arising out of a conspiracy for the importation and distribution of heroin. After full consideration of the numerous arguments raised by appellants, we affirm the judgments below in all respects.
I
FACTS
The indictment named nine defendants and two unindicted coconspirators. Three of the named defendants, Ibraham Ammar, Abedeen Ammar, and Naim Dahabi, were fugitives at the time of trial; two other defendants, Charles Rossi and Michael Dugan, pleaded guilty and testified for the government; the…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by221 opinions
- State v. LobatoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- John Doe v. Princeton UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Linette Perez, United States of America v. Juancho Alcantera, United States of America v. Edmundo BatoonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
216 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.