Legal Opinion
Robert HADDAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 28, 1983No. 81-5041PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Robert Haddad appeals from the district court’s judgment on his national origin discrimination claim, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (1976 & Supp. V 1981), and from the jury’s verdict on his age discrimination in employment claim, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. (1976 & Supp. Y 1981). Both claims arise from the same allegedly improper acts by appellee Lockheed. Despite the admission of improper evidence at trial, we affirm both the court’s judgment and the jury’s verdict.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Appellant Robert Haddad worked for ap-pellee Lockheed California…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Larez v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lynne S. Taylor, and Keisha Johnson v. Virginia Union University, Keisha Johnson, and Lynne S. Taylor v. Virginia Union UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Larez v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.