Legal Opinion

United States v. Perez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1981No. 80-1320PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge:

I

Appellant Ruvalcaba-Villalobos was convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and distribution of cocaine. On appeal he contends: (1) there was insufficient evidence of conspiracy and his connection to it to justify the admission of certain statements under the coconspirator exception to the federal hearsay rules; (2) his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses was violated by the admission of the coconspirator’s statements; (3) the trial court erred in dismissing a juror; and (4) the trial court erred in sentencing him to a special parole term in connection with…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. DeLunaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. AmmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Leslie Fleishman, United States of America v. Peter Combs, United States of America v. Stephen GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. State v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API