United States v. Frank G. Prantil
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
The defendant, a criminal defense attorney, appeals his conviction on eight out of eleven counts alleged in an indictment for the offenses of perjury, 18 U.S.C. § 1623; false statements, 18 U.S.C. § 1001; and being accessory after the fact, 18 U.S.C. § 3. All of the defendant’s convictions are predicated on actions he took while representing a criminal defendant, Betty Powell, in a separate criminal prosecution. After a seven-day trial the jury found the defendant not guilty on two counts of harboring a fugitive and perjury. The district court had previously dismissed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- United States v. David Dominic NecoecheaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Mark A. Hopkinson v. Duane Shillinger, and the Attorney General of the State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.