Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank G. Prantil

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 25, 1985No. 84-5024PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:

The defendant, a criminal defense attorney, appeals his conviction on eight out of eleven counts alleged in an indictment for the offenses of perjury, 18 U.S.C. § 1623; false statements, 18 U.S.C. § 1001; and being accessory after the fact, 18 U.S.C. § 3. All of the defendant’s convictions are predicated on actions he took while representing a criminal defendant, Betty Powell, in a separate criminal prosecution. After a seven-day trial the jury found the defendant not guilty on two counts of harboring a fugitive and perjury. The district court had previously dismissed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. United States v. David Dominic NecoecheaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Mark A. Hopkinson v. Duane Shillinger, and the Attorney General of the State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API