Legal Opinion

Rognrust v. Seto

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 30, 1970No. 131-40969-1PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Horowitz, A. C. J.

Plaintiffs Rognrust recovered judgment against the defendants Seto fixing the boundary line between their adjoining tracts of land in accordance with a written survey and granting incidental relief. The trial court rejected Setos’ contention that by adverse possession they were entitled to an approximate 2-foot strip of the plaintiffs’ property so adjudged. Setos appeal, their assignments of error raising the common question as to whether there is substantial evidence to support the court’s findings rejecting their claim of adverse possession.

Lot 21 is located immediately…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ferree v. Doric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. El Cerrito, Inc. v. RyndakWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. N. Fiorito Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Keene v. BehanWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Mugaas v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1949

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Brewer v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. Burr v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. Brauhn v. BrauhnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API