Rognrust v. Seto
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Horowitz, A. C. J.
Plaintiffs Rognrust recovered judgment against the defendants Seto fixing the boundary line between their adjoining tracts of land in accordance with a written survey and granting incidental relief. The trial court rejected Setos’ contention that by adverse possession they were entitled to an approximate 2-foot strip of the plaintiffs’ property so adjudged. Setos appeal, their assignments of error raising the common question as to whether there is substantial evidence to support the court’s findings rejecting their claim of adverse possession.
Lot 21 is located immediately…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ferree v. Doric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- El Cerrito, Inc. v. RyndakWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- N. Fiorito Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Keene v. BehanWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Mugaas v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1949
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Brewer v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Burr v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Brauhn v. BrauhnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.