Dunn v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ORRICK, District Judge.
In a motion to remand this case to state court, plaintiff raises a question of first impression; namely, whether in a diversity action she can escape federal jurisdiction by limiting her recovery in the ad damnum clause in the prayer of the complaint, filed in a California court, to an amount just below the jurisdictionally required $50,000. Plaintiff claims that, notwithstanding her damage allegations of more than twice the jurisdictional minimum, her ad damnum clause purporting to waive damages exceeding $49,900 should defeat federal jurisdiction.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Horton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Roberson v. DaleDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1979
- Damele v. MacK Trucks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Frost v. MighettoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Landmark Corp. v. Apogee Coal Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996
- Adkins v. GibsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
- Watterson v. GMRI, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1997
- Lovell v. Bad Ass Coffee Co. of Hawaii, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
- Haskell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2002