Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 20, 1994No. C 94-0016 WHOPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ORRICK, District Judge.

In a motion to remand this case to state court, plaintiff raises a question of first impression; namely, whether in a diversity action she can escape federal jurisdiction by limiting her recovery in the ad damnum clause in the prayer of the complaint, filed in a California court, to an amount just below the jurisdictionally required $50,000. Plaintiff claims that, notwithstanding her damage allegations of more than twice the jurisdictional minimum, her ad damnum clause purporting to waive damages exceeding $49,900 should defeat federal jurisdiction.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Horton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Roberson v. DaleDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1979
  4. Damele v. MacK Trucks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Frost v. MighettoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Landmark Corp. v. Apogee Coal Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996
  2. Adkins v. GibsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
  3. Watterson v. GMRI, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1997
  4. Lovell v. Bad Ass Coffee Co. of Hawaii, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
  5. Haskell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API