Legal Opinion
Patel v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 21, 2014No. Case No. 14-cv-00851-JSTPublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Re: ECF No. 12
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND
JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant Nike Retail Services, Inc. removed this action from the Alameda County Superior Court on diversity jurisdiction grounds. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff Payal Patel now moves to remand it. ECF No. 12. At issue is whether the federal “amount in controversy” requirement has been satisfied. The matter came for hearing on May 8, 2014.
The Court will grant the motion.
II. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural and Factual History
Plaintiff alleges that she was employed by Defendant as an Assistant Store Manager from…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Ritenour v. Carrington Mortgage Services LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Van Steenhuyse v. UBS Fin. Servs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Abelardo Martinez, Jr. v. CotN Wash, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Angel Zamora v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.District Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Atkinson v. Life Care Centers of America IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.