Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1965No. 8049PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Certiorari to review findings and award for noncompensable claim made by the Industrial Commission of Arizona in the above-numbered cause on the 31st day of May 1963.

Hereinafter, Inez Martinez will be referred to as “petitioner”. Jackson & Perkins Company will be referred to as “employer”, and the Industrial Commission of Arizona will be referred to as “the Commission”.

The record discloses that petitioner claims he sustained a personal injury on Thursday the 21st day of March 1963, while working for the employer as a carpenter. He claims the injury arose out of and in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guy F. Atkinson Co. v. KinseyArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Martin v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Smith v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hogle v. Arizona Concrete Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Naylor v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bekins FreightArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Davila v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Best v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Pinkerton v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Herman v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API