Legal Opinion

Martin v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1960No. 6801PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Commission denying the application of petitioner to reopen a claim for workman’s compensation.

It appears from the record that on November 29, 1942, Harold E. Martin, petitioner herein, was nailing a partition for his employer, the Sundt Construction Company, in Tucson, Arizona, when a plank struck petitioner on the back of the head and neck, or medically, between the scapulae. Thereafter, petitioner was examined by Dr. R. W. Rudolph, who filed an Industrial Report of Attending Physician, advising that he found soreness…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Doby v. Miami Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. English v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Company v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Edens v. L. E. Dixon Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Stancil v. MasseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  3. Gordon v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. Ohlmaier v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Stancil v. MasseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API