Guy F. Atkinson Co. v. Kinsey
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WINDES, Superior Judge.
The fact situation is as follows:
The respondent, L. L. Kinsey, hereinafter referred to as applicant, was employed by petitioner, Atkinson-Kier Company, hereinafter referred to as the Company. The applicant claims to have been injured by an accident arising out of said employment on September 8, 1942. His claim for compensation was duly filed on September 29th, and on October 2nd he called at the office of respondent Industrial Commission and was advised by the assistant claims manager that his claim was being denied, due to the fact that there was no accident disclosed.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zagar v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Doby v. Miami Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Salt Lake City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- Cooper v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Schultz v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Steward v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Black v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Gallegos v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Martin v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.