Legal Opinion

Smith v. Industrial Commission of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1955No. 6002PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Petitioner, Frank L. Smith, obtained a writ of certiorari to review an award of respondent Industrial Commission denying him compensation. The respondent promptly filed a motion to quash the writ and dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction, on the ground the award had become res judicata. We reserved a ruling upon this motion until the matter was heard on its merits.

An understanding of the problems presented by the motion to quash can best be developed by setting forth the following time-table of the various procedural steps taken:

Year 1954

June 22 Injury occurred.

July 20…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hershkowitz v. Arizona Highway DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Nevitt v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Green v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hershkowitz v. Arizona Highway DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ross v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Best v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Narramore v. Fannin's Gas & Equipment CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State Compensation Fund v. McCOMB AND INDUS. COM'NCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Martinez v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API