State v. Thomas
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Appellant contends that he was entitled to nonsuit on the grounds that the State’s evidence disclosed that he possessed at most only a tiny amount of the substance heroin and that possession of such a small quantity should not be considered an offense under G.S. 90-95 (a) (3). That statute, however, makes it unlawful for any person to possess “a controlled substance included in any schedule” of the North Carolina Controlled Substances Act without regard to the amount involved. It may be, as defendant contends, that possession of a mere trace of a controlled substance is not in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Neely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Lee v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.