Legal Opinion

State v. McNeil

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1980No. 7910SC968PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

By his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial judge improperly referred to the bills of indictment returned against him while informing prospective jurors about the case, and that the trial judge erred by reading the bills of indictment to the jury during his jury charge.

With respect to the trial judge’s opening remarks, defendant complains of the following portion:

The defendant, Clarence David McNeil, is charged in one bill of indictment with the felony possession with intent to sell and deliver a controlled substance, to wit: Phenmetra-zine, which…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. LinerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. MayesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API