Legal Opinion
Neely v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 6, 1924No. 2308PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error were defendants below, and will be so styled here. They were- convicted on five counts of an indictment which charged them with violating sections 3258, 3281, and 3279 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. §§ 5994, 6019, 6021), by unlawfully, first, having in their possession and under their control a still and distilling apparatus set up without having the same registered as required by law;- second, carrying on the business of distiller of spirituous liquors without having given bond as required by law; third, engaging in and carrying on the business…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. StafoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Powers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- In Re HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- In Re De BaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Morgan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Frank Kennedy v. Curtis Reid, Superintendent, District of Columbia JailCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Phillips v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- McKee v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- State v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Levine v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.