In the Interest of W.C.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WITTIG, Justice.
This is a termination of parental rights case. We first address the proper standard of review for legal and factual sufficiency challenges where the burden of proof at trial was by clear and convincing evidence. We then determine whether an unobjected-to hearsay report admitted at trial showing that appellant abused her child constituted legally and factually sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s finding that appellant engaged in conduct endangering the physical and emotional well-being of her child. We affirm.
Background
Appellant is the biological mother of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re HinterlongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Campbell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- In the Interest of N.K. and D.T.K., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.