Legal Opinion

Campbell v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided April 12, 2004No. 14-01-00741-CVPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

EVA M. GUZMAN, Justice.

Nathan Dale Campbell appeals from a court order in a civil proceeding extending his involuntary commitment for inpatient mental health services for another year. In five issues, he contends: (1) the evidence is legally insufficient to support the verdict; (2) the trial court erred in overruling his objections to the jury charge; and (3) the court erred in denying his motion for a continuance. In a cross-issue, the State argues that no rational jury could have failed to find Campbell was likely to cause serious harm to others. We reverse and remand for a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Ortiz v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Leitch v. HornsbyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Paulson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Campbell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. Finley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Harrison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Doremus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API