Lamacchia v. Chilinsky
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
In this action for dissolution of marriage, the plaintiff, Guy S. Lamacchia, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, challenging the allocation of present and future guardian ad litem fees to be paid 80 percent by the plaintiff and 20 percent by the defendant, Magdalena Chilinsky. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court abused its discretion in ordering payment of present and future fees. We affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are necessary to our resolution of the plaintiffs appeal. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schult v. SchultSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Clement v. ClementConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Roach v. RoachConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Prial v. PrialConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Sachs v. SachsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fish v. FishConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Buehler v. BuehlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009