Legal Opinion

Demartino v. Demartino

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 16, 2003No. AC 23413PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The defendant, Victoria Ann Demartino, appeals from the postjudgment order of the trial court granting the motion filed by the plaintiff, John J. Demartino, to open the judgment and to modify or to terminate his periodic alimony payments to her. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) found a substantial change in circumstances warranting a modification and prospective termination of alimony because there was insufficient evidence concerning the future economic conditions of the parties1 *490and (2) modified the alimony order inconsistent with the factors…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Knock v. KnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Drisdelle v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ebach v. EbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Hornung v. HornungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  3. Metcalf v. MetcalfNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Simes v. SimesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. Moran v. MorneauConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API