Legal Opinion

Gourley v. Crossett Public Schools

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 7, 1998No. 97-974PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

Appellant Carolyn Gourley appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees, who are the Crossett Public Schools and former and current members of the District’s Board of Directors (the District). The trial court ruled that Ms. Gourley’s claim for the intentional tort of outrage is barred by the doctrine of election of remedies because she had previously accepted benefits from the Workers’ Compensation Commission. We agree and affirm.

At the time of her complaint for workers’ compensation benefits, Ms. Gourley was a seventh grade mathematics teacher at Daniel…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heskett v. Fisher Laundry & Cleaners Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Culpepper v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Crossett School District v. GourleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  4. THOMAS BY CITY NAT. BANK v. Valmac Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Hill v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Helf v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Craven v. Fulton Sanitation Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. International Paper Co. v. Clark County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. Pope County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Automated Conveyor Systems v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API