Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo
The Dayton Power and Light Company, an Ohio corporation, is here as appellant challenging the validity of an order of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, affirmed by the Supreme Court of that state, which prescribes the rates chargeable to consumers of natural gas.
The appellant is a distributing company, producing no gas and owning no wells. The gas that it distributes it buys from the Ohio Fuel Gas Company, an affiliated corporation, delivery being made to it by the seller at the gateways of the towns and cities where its mains and service pipes are laid. Both seller and buyer are…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by200 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.