Legal Opinion

Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 30, 1934No. 609PublishedCited by 200 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo

The Dayton Power and Light Company, an Ohio corporation, is here as appellant challenging the validity of an order of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, affirmed by the Supreme Court of that state, which prescribes the rates chargeable to consumers of natural gas.

The appellant is a distributing company, producing no gas and owning no wells. The gas that it distributes it buys from the Ohio Fuel Gas Company, an affiliated corporation, delivery being made to it by the seller at the gateways of the towns and cities where its mains and service pipes are laid. Both seller and buyer are…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by200 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API