State v. Carosella, 07 Ma 204 (12-2-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Frank Carosella appeals from his sentence entered in the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court. He contends his rights under Crim. R. 25(B) were violated where a different judge sentenced him than the one who accepted his guilty plea. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
{¶ 2} Appellant was indicted for possession of crack cocaine, a fifth degree felony due to the weight being under a gram. As can be seen by his July 2007 motion to suppress, his case was apparently assigned to Judge Cronin's court. On August…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. RobbOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. HuttonOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Berger v. BergerOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Beatty v. AlstonOhio Supreme Court · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.