Legal Opinion

State v. Carosella, 07 Ma 204 (12-2-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 2008No. 07 MA 204Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Frank Carosella appeals from his sentence entered in the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court. He contends his rights under Crim. R. 25(B) were violated where a different judge sentenced him than the one who accepted his guilty plea. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

{¶ 2} Appellant was indicted for possession of crack cocaine, a fifth degree felony due to the weight being under a gram. As can be seen by his July 2007 motion to suppress, his case was apparently assigned to Judge Cronin's court. On August…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. RobbOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. HuttonOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Berger v. BergerOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Beatty v. AlstonOhio Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API