Legal Opinion
State v. Robb
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 2000No. 98-1166PublishedCited by 167 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
In this appeal, defendant advances twenty-nine propositions of law. (See Appendix.) Finding none meritorious, we affirm his convictions. We have also independently weighed the aggravating circumstances against mitigating factors, and compared his sentences to those imposed in similar cases, as R.C. 2929.05(A) requires. As a result, we affirm the sentences of death.
I
PRETRIAL MOTION TO SUPPRESS
In proposition of law I, defendant argues that FBI tunnel microphones and recorders installed during the siege, which intercepted and recorded inmate conversations, violated inmates’ rights to private…
2Cases cited106 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by167 opinions
- Donald Williams, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Carl S. Anderson, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Ronald Combs, Jason Robb, and George Skatzes v. Reginald Wilkinson, Director of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2001
162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.